Even At Low Doses Psychedelics Are Powerful Compounds...

Even at low doses, psychedelics are powerful compounds. Here are some considerations: - Physiological safety: Classical psychedelics are generally not toxic to organs at typical doses. But LSD can cause increased heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature even in micro amounts. If someone has a heart condition or severe anxiety, that might be an issue. There’s also a phenomenon of tolerance – if you microdose every day, it quickly stops having an effect (the receptors downregulate). That’s why many protocols suggest dosing only 2-3 times a week with off days. - Overdoing by accident: Since these substances are illegal and unregulated, dosing is a guessing game. One mushroom may be twice as potent as another. One drop of LSD from one source could be stronger than from another. It’s easy to accidentally take more than intended and suddenly you’re having a not-so-micro experience. A too-strong dose could impair your functioning for a few hours (imagine trying to work while mildly tripping – probably not great, you’d be distracted). - Psychological risks: High doses of psychedelics carry risk of precipitating psychosis in vulnerable individuals, or causing very distressing experiences (bad trips). At microdoses, those acute risks are minimal, but for someone with a history (or family history) of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, even small disturbances in brain chemistry could be risky. There’s not enough research to say it’s safe for them. Additionally, some microdosers report increased anxiety or irritability on dosing days – it’s not universally blissful. It can also interfere with sleep if taken too late in the day (due to stimulation). - Legal risk: As mentioned, possessing LSD or psilocybin is illegal in many jurisdictions. If you’re sourcing these to microdose, you’re still breaking the law. The chances of getting caught microdosing might be low (since you need very small amounts, you’re not likely trafficking), but it’s a non-zero risk. Worth noting. - Unknown long-term effects: There have been communities of microdosers who do it for months or years. So far, no obvious red flags have popped up from long-term use, but it hasn’t been rigorously studied. Could frequent microdosing lead to changes in personality, cognition, or physical health over many years? We simply don’t know. Some worry about heart valve issues because other serotonin agonists (like certain appetite suppressants) caused valve problems – but those are different mechanisms; still, long-term effect on heart isn’t studied. - Contamination/adulterants: If you buy LSD from some random source, do you really know it’s LSD and not some research chemical? There are NBOMe compounds that some unscrupulous dealers pass off as LSD; those have had reports of overdose fatalities even at tiny doses. Testing kits exist and should be used if anyone is considering this (they can confirm if something is likely LSD or psilocybin). - Dependency or crutch mentality: Classic psychedelics aren’t known to be addictive (no one has an LSD “addiction” in the way one might with alcohol or opioids). Tolerance also prevents daily use. However, one could become psychologically reliant – feeling like you can’t be productive or creative without microdosing. That can be a psychological crutch. Ideally, one would want to integrate any insights or benefits such that you don’t need to microdose forever.

One more risk is misdosing due to error. There’s a somewhat humorous but telling story: some people participating in a self-blinded microdose study accidentally took a larger dose on the last day (due to a packing mistake) and knew right away – as one put it, “I took a microdose, but I think it was actually a full dose!” Imagine accidentally going to work like that.

It’s important to remember that microdosing is not a scientifically validated treatment (yet). People with serious conditions like clinical depression – some might be tempted to drop their prescribed meds and microdose instead. That could be risky, especially since, unlike a supervised treatment, you’re on your own figuring stuff out.

What About Macrodosing (Full Trips) vs Microdosing?

This article is focused on microdosing, but for context: Full-dose psychedelic therapy is showing promise for things like treatment-resistant depression, PTSD (with MDMA), end-of-life anxiety, etc. Those sessions typically involve one or a few supervised psychedelic experiences that are intense and meant to catalyze change, often paired with therapy. Microdosing, by contrast, is more like a supplement routine – frequent and low-grade.

Some psychedelic researchers hypothesize that a lot of the therapeutic effect of psychedelics comes from the profound psychological experience and insights during a full trip. Microdosing removes that aspect, so maybe it’s not surprising that its effects would be smaller or hard to detect. It could be that microdosing’s main leverage is physiological (like maybe a mild antidepressant effect via serotonin) but without the “mind-blowing” part that leads to deep cognitive shifts.

Legal and Ethical Considerations

While not a “brain effect,” it’s worth noting: - In places where it’s illegal, even talking about it or encouraging it can be sensitive. Researchers studying microdosing often had to rely on people sourcing their own psychedelics (for legal reasons, the researchers can’t provide illegal drugs). For instance, the self-blinding study had participants put their own substance into capsules and the researchers just guided the process. - Decriminalization movements are growing. Some cities and states have decriminalized personal use of psilocybin (and entheogenic plants) or allowed research. If microdosing does show benefits, one ethical question is – should people be allowed to legally microdose if they want? How would we ensure safety? It’s an evolving conversation.

The Bottom Line

Microdosing is intriguing, but far from a proven panacea. The current evidence suggests that a lot of the benefit might be placebo or indirect (coming from intentional routine and positive mindset). That said, ongoing research could uncover specific situations or conditions where microdosing truly helps. Perhaps, for example, microdosing could enhance the effects of psychotherapy by making the brain slightly more plastic – that’s speculative but being looked at.

If someone is considering microdosing, they should weigh the risks: - Legal: is it worth breaking the law? - Health: do you have any condition that could be worsened? - Are you okay with possibly just getting a placebo effect? (Some say, even if it’s placebo, I feel better – but the law/expense risk for just placebo effect is a consideration.)

Also, microdosing is not a substitute for healthy habits. You likely get more cognitive boost from a good night’s sleep, exercise, and a cup of coffee than from a tiny bit of LSD – plus, those are legal and free/cheap! The allure is understandable though: the idea of a gentle mental enhancer without major side effects is attractive. Who wouldn’t want to take a brain vitamin that makes you 10% more productive or 10% happier?

Unfortunately, we’re not quite sure microdosing reliably does that. As one Harvard Health article bluntly put it: “There isn’t yet definitive proof that microdosing is at all helpful, or even that it is safe in the long term.” Before you put something in your body, that’s a good thing to keep in mind.

Perhaps the biggest benefit microdosing has already provided is sparking renewed mainstream interest in psychedelics which led to more research on full-dose psychedelic therapy (which is showing strong results in some areas). In an indirect way, the microdosing fad helped destigmatize the word “LSD” or “mushrooms” by reframing them as potential productivity or wellness tools rather than scary drugs – which opened some minds.

In closing, if you hear miraculous testimonials about microdosing, take them with a grain of salt. Science will hopefully catch up with more robust answers soon. In the meantime, focusing on proven methods of improving your brain function and mood (sleep, exercise, mindfulness, therapy, nutrition, meaningful activities) is a safer bet. And if you’re still microdose-curious, keep an eye on current research – just do so with clear eyes about the uncertainties.

As with any trend, separating myth from reality empowers you to make better choices for your brain. For microdosing, the story is still being written, and it’s a fascinating one – but it’s not an instruction manual yet. This is the end of this article.

The Cognitive Cost of Multitasking: Why Focus Wins

In today’s hyper-connected world, multitasking seems not just common, but expected. We juggle emails while on phone calls, switch between dozens of open browser tabs, or try to work while monitoring chat messages and notifications. It feels like we’re doing more. But are we really accomplishing more, or are we paying a hidden cognitive price? A growing body of research suggests that multitasking isn’t the productivity booster we think it is – in fact, it can impair performance, increase errors, and even reduce our brain’s efficiency. In contrast, the power of sustained focus (single-tasking) is emerging as the true winner for productivity and mental well-being.

Let’s unpack what happens in the brain during multitasking, why it incurs costs, and why focusing on one thing at a time can lead to better results. Consider this a gentle intervention for our multitasking-addicted culture: sometimes, less (simultaneous tasks) is more.

The Illusion of Multitasking

First, a clarification: when we say “multitasking,” we usually mean trying to perform multiple attention-requiring tasks at the same time or rapidly switching between them. Examples: typing an essay while listening to a podcast, or reading texts while watching a lecture. True simultaneous multitasking (like literally doing two mental tasks at once) is mostly a myth for complex tasks – except for some automated behaviors like walking and talking, your brain largely can’t do two things in parallel that both require concentration. What we’re actually doing is task-switching – bouncing between tasks quickly.

Your brain does this by shifting attention networks and reloading context each time. Imagine you’re writing a report (Task A) and you check your email (Task B) when a notification pops up, then return to writing (back to Task A). That seems quick, but under the hood your brain had to drop the writing context, pick up “email mode” (including remembering what the email is about, what you need to respond), then later re-engage “writing mode” (where was I in that paragraph? What was I trying to say?). This switching has a cost called switch cost or task switch cost, which can be time lost or mental energy expended.

Research by the American Psychological Association and others has found that even brief mental blocks when shifting tasks can cost up to 40% of someone’s productive time. Yes, that quick glance at your phone might seem harmless, but add up all those little “reorientation” moments in a day and you could be losing nearly half your productive potential! That stat is often cited from work by Dr. David Meyer and colleagues who studied task-switching costs.

Another study from Stanford (Ophir et al., 2009) found heavy multitaskers (people who habitually do a lot of media multitasking) performed worse on tasks of filtering out distractions and memory than light multitaskers. The heavy multitaskers couldn’t pay attention as well, likely because they had trained their brains to be in a constant state of partial attention, easily distracted.

So, the illusion is that we’re getting more done. In reality, we’re often doing more things, but each less effectively, and taking longer in total than if we did them one by one.

The Brain on Multitasking: Frazzled and Slower

Why is multitasking so inefficient? Let’s peek into the brain: - Attention Residue: After you switch tasks, a part of your attention is still thinking about the previous task – this is sometimes called attention residue. Have you ever tried to resume writing something and for a few minutes you’re still half-pondering the email you just read? That’s residue, and it means you’re not fully engaged on the current task. The brain’s prefrontal cortex is trying to hold multiple goals in mind and it gets cluttered. - Executive Function Overload: The prefrontal cortex (the area behind your forehead) is like the boss of your brain, deciding what to do next. It can only make one decision at a time in a serial manner. When you multitask, the poor boss is frantically telling your brain “Stop doing X, start doing Y... oh wait stop Y, back to X!”. This uses up executive resources, which are limited. We actually have a finite well of willpower and attention each day, and multitasking drains it faster because you’re constantly re-engaging control processes. - Working Memory Impact: Your working memory is what you hold in mind at a given moment (like a scratchpad for thoughts). Multitasking floods it with too much info from different tasks, making it more likely you’ll forget or mix up details. For example, you might mis-type what someone is saying on a call because your brain is juggling the conversation and the typing content simultaneously, and bits get crossed. - Stress and Error rates: The mental stress of multitasking can raise cortisol (stress hormone) and adrenaline. This puts you in a state of high alert, which can feel stimulating (some people get addicted to the rush of busy multitasking), but chronic elevation can exhaust you and actually impair clear thinking. Not to mention, more errors slip through. A classic finding: people who drive while talking on the phone (even hands-free) have slower reaction times and more driving errors, comparable to driving under influence. The brain simply cannot give full attention to road safety while formulating sentences in a conversation – something’s gotta give, and often it’s the driving performance. - Reduced Creativity: When you constantly switch, you disrupt the flow state – that deeply absorbed state where you may make novel connections or progress into deeper levels of a problem. If you’re always resetting your focus, you don’t allow the brain the sustained time needed for creative incubation or complex problem-solving.

In summary, multitasking scatterbrains your focus. Each switch might only cost a few tenths of a second or a few seconds of realignment, but multiply that by hundreds of switches a day and it’s significant. Some estimates: a 1-second switch delay for a heavy computer user who switches windows 1200 times a day = 20 minutes lost just in reorientation. And 1 second is conservative – often the “restart time” is more like 10-15 seconds or more to regain full context.

Why Focus (Single-Tasking) Wins

On the flip side, focusing on one task at a time (sometimes called monotasking or single-tasking) allows your brain to fully devote its resources to that task. Here are the advantages: - Deep Work Quality: As Cal Newport famously detailed in “Deep Work,” when you give full, uninterrupted focus to a cognitively demanding task, you produce better output in less time. Your brain can enter a zone where relevant ideas come more easily, you can solve harder problems, and the work may even feel more satisfying or meaningful. - Speed: It’s actually faster to do things sequentially than in parallel in most cases. If you need to do Task A and Task B, doing A then B will typically finish sooner than interweaving them. Why? Because interweaving introduces all those switch costs and likely mistakes that need revisiting. By focusing, you reduce error and eliminate the constant start/stop inefficiency. - Memory Retention: If you study or read while multitasking, you retain less. Focus aids memory encoding because your brain is fully processing the material. If you’re splitting attention, things only get a shallow pass. That’s why background TV or looking at your phone during class can hurt learning. Focused attention is like giving your brain high-quality ingredients to store a memory. - Lower Stress, More Enjoyment: Multitasking can put you in a perpetual slight fight-or-flight mode (juggling, anticipating the next thing). Focusing can be almost meditative. You immerse in one thing. Many people report that when they started time-blocking and single-tasking, their anxiety went down and work felt more rewarding. You can actually fully experience a task (even a mundane one) which can be more fulfilling than doing three things shallowly. - Builds Attention Muscle: Practicing focus is like training a muscle. Over time, you get better at resisting distractions and concentrating for longer stretches. In contrast, frequent multitasking trains you to be distracted (you’re effectively reinforcing to your brain that it’s good to switch attention constantly). So focus begets more focus ability.

There’s also the concept of flow as mentioned: Flow is a state of intense focus where you lose track of time and perform at your best. It typically requires no distractions and clear goals. You simply cannot achieve a flow state if you’re checking notifications or dividing your attention. It’s single-tasking taken to the max. Why does flow matter? People in flow can be up to 5 times more productive according to some studies. Also, it’s often accompanied by enjoyment or at least deep satisfaction.

Multi-Tasking, Multi-Mistakes

A tangible way to consider multitasking’s effect is error rates. Some findings: - When our brain is toggling, we’re more likely to make mistakes like typos, mis-hearing information, or overlooking details. Think of how many “oops” emails have been sent because someone was writing it while on a call and didn’t proofread properly. - Research from the University of Utah found that only about 2% of people can multitask effectively without performance decline (they called them “supertaskers”). So unless you’re an exceptional outlier, odds are your multitasking is hurting your performance more than you realize. - Medication errors in hospitals, for example, are often linked to nurses or doctors being interrupted or multitasking during ordering/administering. A focused process drastically reduces such errors.

This is why some high-stakes professions try to minimize distractions: Air traffic controllers work in environments that enforce focus (and even they have limits on how long they can safely work before a break because attention degrades). Pilots use checklists and “sterile cockpit” rules (no irrelevant conversation during critical phases of flight). These practices arose because multitasking or divided attention can literally be fatal in such contexts.

While your office work may not be life-or-death, the same principles apply to quality and safety of work.

Digital Multitasking: A Modern Plague

Our devices encourage multitasking: multiple apps, notifications, split screens. How often have you caught yourself unlocking your phone to do one thing, then doing something else entirely because another app stole your attention? It’s designed for that – every app vying for your engagement.

One study found the average smartphone user switches tasks (within the phone) every 10 seconds, hardly staying on one thing unless it’s watching a video or reading a longer piece. On computers, people switch windows or tabs hundreds of times a day. Each switch, a small cost.

Digital detox or monotasking challenges have grown as a response. Even productivity methods like the Pomodoro Technique (25 minutes on one task, 5 min break) aim to strengthen your focus muscle step by step. These techniques acknowledge that focus is not easy in our world, but it’s trainable and extremely valuable.

How to Reclaim Focus in a Multitasking World

To truly harness why focus wins, you might want to adopt strategies to minimize multitasking: - Time blocking: Dedicate chunks of time to one project or type of work, and stick to it. During that time, close other apps, put your phone away. It’s like creating a focus bubble. - Turn off non-essential notifications: Each “ping” is a potential derailment. Batch your email and message checking times instead of reading each as it arrives. - Use do-not-disturb modes or site blockers: If you can’t resist the pull, technology can ironically help by blocking tempting distractions during focus periods. - Set expectations with others: Let coworkers or family know that from X to Y time you’ll be concentrating and prefer not to be interrupted unless urgent. Many companies now understand the need for meeting-free focus time or deep work days. - Practice mindfulness or single-tasking in daily life: When eating, just eat (don’t also scroll your phone). When listening to someone, truly listen (don’t formulate your text response to someone else in your head). These practices spill over and improve concentration overall. - One thing on your desk (or screen) at a time: A cluttered screen or desk can subconsciously remind you of other tasks. If possible, hide or remove items unrelated to the current focus. Some people like full-screen mode for writing to eliminate other windows, or physically clearing a workspace except for what’s needed for Task A.

The payoff of focusing is often felt quickly: you may find you finish a dreaded task in half the time you expected because you weren’t also juggling something else. You might feel less mentally drained at day’s end when you’ve had a couple hours of true focus instead of eight hours of fractured attention.

Conclusion: Quality Over Quantity

Our brains have amazing capabilities, but doing many things at once isn’t one of them. We’ve been sold a myth that the more we can do simultaneously, the more productive or talented we are. In truth, multitasking often means doing multiple things sub-optimally. It’s like trying to listen to several songs at once; you end up appreciating none of them and just hearing noise.

On the other hand, focusing on one task is like turning a spotlight onto it – you see it clearly, you work on it thoroughly, and often, you complete it more swiftly. Focus yields quality and efficiency, whereas multitasking trades both for the mere feeling of busyness.

In a world full of digital distractions and endless to-do lists, cultivating focus is a superpower. It might feel hard at first – we almost have to withdraw from an addiction to instant hits of novelty – but the results speak for themselves. Try an experiment: tomorrow, take just one important task you need to do. Give it your undivided attention for an hour, no checking anything else. You may be surprised at how much you get done and how good it feels to give something proper attention.

In the end, multitasking often costs more time than it saves, and it costs peace of mind too. By choosing focus, you choose a calmer, more effective way of working that aligns with how our brains function best. In the contest of productivity, focus wins gold and multitasking doesn’t even make the podium. So let’s give our brains the gift of doing one thing at a time – and doing it well. This is the end of this article.

The Brain on Nature: Why Time Outside Improves Mental Health